| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Lostinthestates
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Bethlehem, USA
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: EE: What's up with Stacey and Max? |
 |
|
|
|
| Ok I have a question to all women here. So Stacey is protecting Max from being caught out by his wife! She clearly wants to be with him! So why is she covering for him? Is this a real stupid story line (that's what it seems to me) or is there some point of the female psyche I do not understand (also very likely :-)! I am curious about your views! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Skylace
Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
It's not really the female psyche I think as much as the cheating individual's psyche. She knows that if Tanya finds out that Max will be furious and probably end it with her and she doesn't want to take that risk.
Men will do the same thing too. Either way it's just stupid and I am sooooo ready for this storyline to be done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lostinthestates
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Bethlehem, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Me too :-) I can't believe it has been dragging on for so long! EE do tend to (like most soaps) to drag story lines out! I just want Stacey to get back with good old Bradley :-) And Max to be found out! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Skylace
Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| I'm with you 100% The actors for Stacey and Bradley had such wonderful chemistry and they were loads of fun to watch. They could have still had problems for them but this is just stupid. And in all honesty, predictable. The writers need to take some creative writing courses! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Twirley
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Skylace wrote: | It's not really the female psyche I think as much as the cheating individual's psyche. She knows that if Tanya finds out that Max will be furious and probably end it with her and she doesn't want to take that risk.
Men will do the same thing too. Either way it's just stupid and I am sooooo ready for this storyline to be done. |
But will Tanya throw him out this time, that's the question. If she does, what's the chance that Max will stay with Stacey?
It's too dull for words right now. I would rather have seen Stacey and Bradley go through the ups and downs of their relationship than have this crap going on. When will EE get it right?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cori
Joined: 30 Apr 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| NO I DISAGREE! Stacey cannot have Bradster back, I mean geez she's doing his dad, who apparently must be pretty good in the sack. BUT I DO AGREE, let's have an end to this idiotic plot, I'd rather watch Keith picking his toe nails, oh no did I really say that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Twirley
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| cori wrote: | | NO I DISAGREE! Stacey cannot have Bradster back, I mean geez she's doing his dad, who apparently must be pretty good in the sack. BUT I DO AGREE, let's have an end to this idiotic plot, I'd rather watch Keith picking his toe nails, oh no did I really say that? |
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Skylace
Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| cori wrote: | | NO I DISAGREE! Stacey cannot have Bradster back, I mean geez she's doing his dad, who apparently must be pretty good in the sack. BUT I DO AGREE, let's have an end to this idiotic plot, I'd rather watch Keith picking his toe nails, oh no did I really say that? |
Yes you did.
While I don't like Stacey shagging her ex's dad I guess they could call it even for him pressuring her into the abortion and they could start over |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lostinthestates
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Bethlehem, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Skylace wrote: | | cori wrote: | | NO I DISAGREE! Stacey cannot have Bradster back, I mean geez she's doing his dad, who apparently must be pretty good in the sack. BUT I DO AGREE, let's have an end to this idiotic plot, I'd rather watch Keith picking his toe nails, oh no did I really say that? |
Yes you did.
While I don't like Stacey shagging her ex's dad I guess they could call it even for him pressuring her into the abortion and they could start over |
I think that sounds good! Even though I do not agree with the toe nails ;-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marcella-FL
Don't make me pull this van over!!!
Joined: 01 May 2006
Location: KMC, Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| You know she is gonna get back with Bradley and then discover she is pregnant by Max ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lostinthestates
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Bethlehem, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
They are both ginger - so she could easily cover her affaire up  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Skylace
Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Marcella-FL wrote: | | You know she is gonna get back with Bradley and then discover she is pregnant by Max ... |
I have so thought that too. And I hope it's not true  however, it probably is.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
misslisalynn
Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Her ending up pregnant is the typical way these type of storylines go,YAWN. Just give me Bradley and Stacey back together without a baby being brought into the mix. It isn't like with what they have done to each other in the past would let them have smooth reconsilation anyways. NO MORE BABIES ON THE SQUARE THIS YEAR PLEASE, we already have Honey and Dawn, who next...Pat, Yolande, Peggy, Carly who doesn't even have a boyfriend...oh no it's gonna be Shirley after the one off with Kev! UUGGHH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
