Ahmadinejad
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> Pirty's Purgatory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He is still a politician who tries to represent the best interests of his country.

It is the biased pro-war media which will twist anything (and/or invent lies) and kill western experts who look like blowing the whistle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mandy wrote:
Kate, do you really think the "interpreters" who translated his speeches are "HIS" ??????????????

Come on ...


I don't imagine she was "his", but if she wasn't in his employ then that just further proves his utter idiocy. He must know how much Western media wants to paint him as a crazed fool, so if he agreed to be translated by someone he'd never met before, and who was appointed by "The West", then he is a fool. Next time he should use his own translators - people close to him who will be able to translate him extremely accurately to avoid these kinds of arguments.

If the president of Iran can't afford an aide who speaks fluent English and Farsi and is also clued up on his way of thinking, then I'll eat my hat.

Mandy wrote:
His original speech about (not) wiping Israel off the map was translated by the West.


That's not entirely accurate. The first English language translations of that speech (which turned out to be inaccurate) were on his own website. Unless you're suggesting that he allows "The West" to edit the English version of his own website...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Salim201



Joined: 12 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

luke wrote:
i must admit, sometimes its like he's working for bush! theres quite a few things when asked he could clear up, but he never quite manages it - like you say, it doesn't do anything to help irans case



doesn't that presuppose that the defamed have to perpetually defend themselves from furthur defamation? As opposed to ignoring the largely unfounded onslaught altogether!?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
luke



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah i agree he shouldn't have to - but i just wish he made things easier on himself - granted, he shouldn't have to - but thats the way our government and media play things unfortunately - unless we can change that, he has to work the system. its almost like no one in the iranian government reads the propaganda against him and iran to counter it

like the holocaust, i actually agree with him on it - i have lots of questions about how many died and how etc, but why can't he make it super clear that he didn't say and doesn't think it didn't happen, but that he has questions surrounding it? like the wiped of the map thing, why doesn't he ever say - hang on, i never said that israel should be wiped of the map - i said this ...

you know, he'd be helping out massively if he could just say that. i know he shouldn't need to, i know he didn't say them - but imagine if he could just say those two sentences and clear up both those lies?

that he doesn't come out with a nice easy clear and concise response to things like these plays right into bushes and the medias hands - its almost like they don't understand how the propaganda system works here, and like it not, they're loosing the media battle because of it Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He must make many speeches every week. We hear none of them. He could be saying everything Luke & Kate want him to say .. but our compliant media would never report it, unless it can be used against him.

We should be blaming the biased media.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
luke



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree we've got a crap biased media, but thats what we have and he needs to work that system, he shouldn't have to - but thats where we are. take the two speeches in this thread, the university and un - he can't have been given a better chance than those two to clear it up. like i said, in agreement with salim, he shouldn't have to do it - but with the government and media using those two things against him, it just seems to me he's missed a great opportunity to put things straight - i mean, surely, mandy, you'd have liked him to put the record straight on those two issues? imagine if he'd have have come out and said 'i didn't say the holocaust didn't happen, i said ...' and 'i didn't say israel should be wiped of the map, i said ... ' - think of the muppets even now who phone galloway with those two lines?

i mean, i don't think he's a loon or an idiot, like i said maybe he just doesn't understand how the propaganda system here works - which is a real shame, because its that system thats paving the way to war for the government Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nekokate wrote:
Mandy wrote:
Kate, do you really think the "interpreters" who translated his speeches are "HIS" ??????????????

Come on ...


I don't imagine she was "his", but if she wasn't in his employ then that just further proves his utter idiocy. He must know how much Western media wants to paint him as a crazed fool, so if he agreed to be translated by someone he'd never met before, and who was appointed by "The West", then he is a fool. Next time he should use his own translators - people close to him who will be able to translate him extremely accurately to avoid these kinds of arguments.


I can imagine the headlines : "Control Freak Ahmadinejad refuses to address an audience unless he hand picks his interpreter."

Ahmadinejad did well in the US. So he did play the system as best as he could.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Salim201



Joined: 12 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

brief points..

Iran is a persian country 1000s of miles away with an different culture and language, they can't control western interpretations, especially when they are so clearly agenda driven. Its a total mismatch and not worth even attempting.

quick example, take the demonisation of the Khmer Rouge, when the fabrication wasn't even necessary as there were massacres over that period, but the media ran with a '2million' figure for deaths. And now if you look at the source, it was a book written in France which made no such allegation, the French author subsequently cleared up the misreprestations, but the figure was still bandied around indiscriminately.

Its well documented, it just reminds me of the techniques used to demonise Ahmadinejad. Disproportionate concerns, misinterpretations, and then ignoring contrary claims, and corrections in translation. When western journalists had the opportunity of a one-on-one and were asking questions like "will you guarantee us that you won't pursue a nuclear weapon", and "stop killing British troops in Iraq", its just not serious, the arrogance and contempt for other cultures is just stunning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
nico



Joined: 12 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:16 pm    Post subject: Brain drain Reply with quote

nekokate wrote:
Mandy wrote:
Kate, do you really think the "interpreters" who translated his speeches are "HIS" ??????????????

Come on ...


I don't imagine she was "his", but if she wasn't in his employ then that just further proves his utter idiocy. He must know how much Western media wants to paint him as a crazed fool, so if he agreed to be translated by someone he'd never met before, and who was appointed by "The West", then he is a fool. Next time he should use his own translators - people close to him who will be able to translate him extremely accurately to avoid these kinds of arguments.

If the president of Iran can't afford an aide who speaks fluent English and Farsi and is also clued up on his way of thinking, then I'll eat my hat.


Well even if she was his own official Iranian translator, I wouldn't be surprised of a mis-translation considering the huge brain drain in Iran - check THIS.

*embed removed as it didn't display properly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> Pirty's Purgatory All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Couchtripper - 2005-2015