'Illicit' settler food sold in UK stores

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> Pirty's Purgatory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
major.tom
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler


Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Location: BC, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:19 am    Post subject: 'Illicit' settler food sold in UK stores Reply with quote

from link

Quote:
Supermarkets accused of duping customers with 'West Bank' produce grown in Israeli settlements

* Paul Gallagher
* The Observer,
* Sunday July 6, 2008

Food grown on illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied territories is being sold in Britain, often to customers who assume they are buying goods from Palestinian-owned farms.

Tesco, Sainsbury's, Waitrose and Somerfield have all admitted sourcing produce from Israeli-owned farms on Palestinian territory but claimed that labelling the goods 'origin: West Bank' gave enough information for the customer to make an informed choice.

All the leading supermarkets claim they are complying with EU law, which states that the origin of a product on a food label can be given as a geographical region rather than a country - providing the meaning is clear to the consumer. Campaigners say customers are being duped into believing they are buying goods from Palestinian-owned farms, when in reality they are contributing to the economies of the illegal settlements.

Foreign Secretary David Miliband was concerned enough about the issue to raise it with British officials in Jerusalem during his visit there last November.

EU officials in Jerusalem are now checking whether any loopholes are being exploited by British companies.

British policy is clear, with the government's website stating the UN Security Council resolution that 'settlements are illegal under international law and settlement construction is an obstacle to peace'.

According to the UN Office for the Co-ordinator of Humanitarian Affairs, an extra 149 illegal settlements plus 96 'outposts' have been built this year alone. Despite this, British supermarkets appear to have discounted ethical considerations when selling produce grown on illegally occupied land.

Tesco said it sourced 'a number of products' from illegal settlements in the occupied territories, including avocados, herbs, grapes and stonefruit from farms in the West Bank and Golan Heights.

A spokesman said: 'All of these are clearly labelled as far as their origin is concerned. I think we have been working with farmers in the West Bank for some time. Without our business there would, in some areas, be little or no employment at all.

'The farms in the occupied territories will be a mixture of Israeli-owned and Palestinian-owned. We don't particularly look at the nationality of the farm owner, only the ethical standards under which it operates.'

Waitrose sells organic cut herbs from the West Bank, an area it refers to as 'disputed territory'. In a letter to one concerned customer, Waitrose said: 'Whatever our own views may be about Israeli products, we do not think it is right to ask our buyers to base their choice of products on any other criteria than the commercial ones of quality and value for money.'

Waitrose said it labelled these products 'West Bank, as per the guidelines from the EU'. The farms Waitrose uses are near the villages of Mehola, Argaman and Roi, all in the West Bank.

Waitrose tells its customers 'the farms are located in disputed territories in the West Bank. As there is no international agreement as to who actually owns the land, West Bank gives the customer a bit more information.'.

Somerfield also sells herbs from the West Bank. A spokesperson said: 'On occasion our herb suppliers will supplement produce grown in Israel with product from the West Bank to maintain good availability. This represents a small proportion of the herbs we sell. We share the same suppliers with other large UK supermarkets and take a similar stance to identify the product as country of origin West Bank at these times. We have not taken a political stance on this issue.'

Sainsbury's sells dried dates from the occupied territories which are labelled as grown in the West Bank. A spokeswoman said: 'We don't give out the level of detail whether the farm owners are Israeli or Palestinian.' She said Sainsbury's complied with EU law by labelling produce either Gaza, Israel or West Bank whenever it sourced from those areas.

'In ensuring that we follow these regulations, we try to offer an informed choice to our customers and will continue to do so. We do not feel it is right for us to tell our customers what they should or should not buy.'

Another concerned customer was told by Sainsbury's that 'there will always be some products that we source from the West Bank as they are either only grown in the region, there are supplier shortages from other countries or because of quality'.

The EU states that the control of correct labelling is the task of member states' national control authorities such as food inspection bodies or market surveillance authorities. An EU official said: 'For most agricultural goods, the EU does not require any obligatory labelling of the country of origin, except where failure to give such particulars might mislead the consumer to a material degree as to the true origin or provenance of the foodstuff.'

Ruth Tenne, an Israeli peace activist and member of Jews for Boycotting Israeli Goods, said: 'Ethical consumers of all faiths ought to boycott Israeli goods, especially those produced by the Jewish illegal settlements in the West Bank as well as campaigning for divestment from companies which profit from Israel's illegal occupation and for suspending the EU Association Agreement which grants Israel a privileged access to the European market.'

None of the supermarkets approached by The Observer said they would be reviewing their policy.


---

Quote:
Waitrose said: 'Whatever our own views may be about Israeli products, we do not think it is right to ask our buyers to base their choice of products on any other criteria than the commercial ones of quality and value for money.

Sainsbury's said: 'In ensuring that we follow these regulations, we try to offer an informed choice to our customers and will continue to do so. We do not feel it is right for us to tell our customers what they should or should not buy.'


Both statements seem self-serving on their face. By not informing consumers about the source of the products, that's exactly what they're doing, effectively imposing their judgement for their customers'.

I guess there's only one solution: boycott the chains as well as Israeli goods produced from occupied lands.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
luke



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i'm going to email all four chains ( although i only ever use two of them ) and tell them i'm now boycotting them. bastards.

thanks for the article major - i shall be sending this about
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shillax



Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meanwhile, in India and Asia 10 year olds are working 14 hour days for $2 a week to make clothes which these very same people buy with no problem. They're only Sikh's, Hindu's or Christians though, so it don't matter so much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How many Indians/Bangladeshis are living under extreme sanctions forced upon them by an invading country Shillax? That's the difference. These Palestinians should be living in much better conditions, but aren't because of the hated Israelis.

Contrary to what the slimy corporate bastard said in the article, most people won't buy products if they know they're sweat-shop produced unless they themselves are living on or close to the poverty line. Just the other week there were reports of Primark products coming in that way and they immediately lost a lot of customers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
luke



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shillax wrote:
Meanwhile, in India and Asia 10 year olds are working 14 hour days for $2 a week to make clothes which these very same people buy with no problem. They're only Sikh's, Hindu's or Christians though, so it don't matter so much.


i wouldn't knowingly support sweatshops either - and whats religion got to do with anything?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shillax



Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
How many Indians/Bangladeshis are living under extreme sanctions forced upon them by an invading country Shillax? That's the difference. These Palestinians should be living in much better conditions, but aren't because of the hated Israelis.

Contrary to what the slimy corporate bastard said in the article, most people won't buy products if they know they're sweat-shop produced unless they themselves are living on or close to the poverty line. Just the other week there were reports of Primark products coming in that way and they immediately lost a lot of customers.


Lot's of people should be living in better conditions faceless, all over the world. Even in England some people should be living in better conditions. The 'reason' these people aren't living in better conditions isn't the 'real' focus of this newspaper story. The focus of this newspaper story is because it's Palestinians. We must cry foul everytime Israel does something, it makes the Muslims like us.




luke wrote:
and whats religion got to do with anything?


It's got everything to do with it, if you look a little beyond the hype.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

luke wrote:
shillax wrote:
Meanwhile, in India and Asia 10 year olds are working 14 hour days for $2 a week to make clothes which these very same people buy with no problem. They're only Sikh's, Hindu's or Christians though, so it don't matter so much.


i wouldn't knowingly support sweatshops either - and whats religion got to do with anything?


I was thinking the same thing about the religion comment. I could understand it if we were living in a world where Muslims were constantly getting "special treatment" over other religions, but in fact it's currently quite the opposite. As cliched as the phrase is, I often feel that "The last acceptable face of racism" is quite pertinent when it comes to Western attitudes to global Islam.

shillax wrote:
The 'reason' these people aren't living in better conditions isn't the 'real' focus of this newspaper story. The focus of this newspaper story is because it's Palestinians. We must cry foul everytime Israel does something, it makes the Muslims like us.


Hang on. I think you're looking at the report from the wrong angle. The reason a lot of left-wing people place such emphasis on the Israel/Palestine issue is because it is the epcentre of global unrest, it's the defining conflict which, without being resolved, not much else can hope to be resolved.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
luke



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shillax wrote:
It's got everything to do with it, if you look a little beyond the hype.


i don't understand what you mean. nobody, regardless of religion, should have to work in sweatshops for shit pay - everyone is entitled to a decent working environment, fair pay and benefits. i don't think you'll find anyone on this site who thinks is should based upon peoples religion

the reason i'm boycotting those stores in the original article is i purposefully avoid buying any israeli products - just like i'd have avoided buying any apartheid south african products - to be told you're buying palestinian ( and thinking you're supporting the palestinian people and economy ) and then to find you're actually supporting the peoples who are illegally occupying the palestinians land instead is wrong. it would be wrong even if the palestinians were scientologists. that most of the palestians are muslims, or the israelis jewsish, doesn't come into my head.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
major.tom
Macho Business Donkey Wrestler


Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Location: BC, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

luke wrote:
the reason i'm boycotting those stores in the original article is i purposefully avoid buying any israeli products - just like i'd have avoided buying any apartheid south african products - to be told you're buying palestinian ( and thinking you're supporting the palestinian people and economy ) and then to find you're actually supporting the peoples who are illegally occupying the palestinians land instead is wrong. it would be wrong even if the palestinians were scientologists. that most of the palestians are muslims, or the israelis jewish [ed], doesn't come into my head.


Well said, Luke. This issue isn't about religion; it's about basic human rights.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> Pirty's Purgatory All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Couchtripper - 2005-2015