View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nekokate
Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Mandy wrote: | with his reputation on the left enhanced, he could move into a media career ... |
That would be quite interesting! I'd love to see him hosting a phone-in on Air America or maybe getting a regular slot on MSNBC. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Quote: | Intellectual terrorism
For the sake of free speech, British organisations should confront pro-Israel bullies, not appease them.
10.25.2007 | The Guardian
By Ghada Karmi
The newest and least attractive import from America, following on behind Coca-Cola, McDonald's and Friends, is the pro-Israel lobby. The latest target of this US-style campaign is the august Oxford Union.
This week, two Israeli colleagues and I were due to appear at the union to participate in an important debate on the one-state solution in Israel-Palestine. Also invited was the American Jewish scholar and outspoken critic of Israel, Norman Finkelstein. At the last minute, however, the union withdrew its invitation to him, apparently intimidated by threats from various pro-Israel groups.
The Harvard Jewish lawyer and indefatigable defender of Israel, Alan Dershowitz, attacked the topic of the debate as well as the Oxford Union itself. In an article headlined "Oxford Union is dead", he accused it of having become "a propaganda platform for extremist views", and castigated its choice of what he termed anti-Israel and anti-semitic speakers.
Yet Dershowitz could have restored the balance as he saw it; he was the first person invited by the Oxford Union to oppose the motion but he declined due, as he put it, to "the terms of the debate and my proposed teammates".
Dershowitz's article attacking the Oxford Union appeared in the Jerusalem Post in Israel and Frontpage magazine in the US. [Because of British defamation laws Cif has been advised not to provide a link - Ed.]
Dershowitz and Finkelstein were protagonists in a much-publicised academic row in the US, though it is unclear whether this has any relevance to the Oxford Union spat.
In solidarity with Finkelstein and to oppose this gross interference in British democratic life, the three of us on the "one state" side - myself, Avi Shlaim, of St Anthony's College, Oxford, and the Israeli historian Ilan Pappe - decided to withdraw from the debate. This was not an easy decision, since the topic was timely and necessary given the current impasse in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, where innovative solutions are in short supply.
Dershowitz and the other pro-Israel activists may rejoice at their success in derailing an important discussion. But it is of little comfort to those of us who care about freedom of speech in this country. Last May, Dershowitz interfered in British academic life when the University and College Union voted overwhelmingly to debate the merits of boycotting Israeli institutions. He teamed up with a British Jewish lawyer, Anthony Julius, and others, threatening to "devastate and bankrupt" anyone acting against Israeli universities.
In another example of these bullying tactics, the Royal Society of Medicine, one of Britain's most venerable medical institutions, came under an attack this month, unprecedented in its 200 year history. It had invited Dr Derek Summerfield, a psychiatrist (who has also documented Israelős medical abuses against Palestinians in the Occupied Territories), to its conference on Religion, Spirituality and Mental Health. The RSM was immediately bombarded with threats from pro-Israel doctors demanding Dr Summerfield's removal on the grounds that he was époliticalő and biased, and that the RSM's charitable status would be challenged if he remained. Intimidated, the RSM asked Dr Summerfield to withdraw, although they later reinstated him.
The power of the Israel lobby in America is legendary. It demonstrates its influence at many levels. Campus Watch is a network that monitors alleged anti-Israel activity in US academic institutions. The difficulties of promotion in the US for scholars deemed anti-Israeli are notorious. The notable Palestinian academic, Edward Said, was subjected to an unrelenting campaign by pro-Israel groups at Columbia University with threats on his life. His successor, Rashid Khalidi, is the current object of the same campaign of vilification and attack. Finkelstein himself has been denied tenure at his university and everywhere else. The authors of a recent study of the Israel lobby's influence on US foreign policy have been called anti-semites and white supremacists. Former president Jimmy Carter's book, Palestine: peace not apartheid, has earned him the label of "Jew-hater" and Nazi sympathiser. The British publisher, Pluto Press, is likely to be dropped by its American distributors, the University of Michigan Press, because pro-Israel groups accuse it of including "anti-Semitic" (ie pro-Palestinian/critical of Israel) books on its list.
Such activities are familiar in the US. People there are hardened or resigned to having their freedom of expression limited by the pro-Israel lobby, and the threats of Dershowitz would cause no surprise to anyone. But Britain is different, naively innocent in the face of US-style assaults on its scholars and institutions. No wonder that those who have been attacked give in so quickly, nervous of something they do not understand. The UCU leadership, shocked and intimidated by the ferocious reaction to the boycott motion from pro-Israel groups, resorted to legal advice to extricate itself and announced in September that a call to boycott Israeli institutions would be "unlawful". The Oxford Union jettisoned one of its participants rather than stand up to the threats of its critics. The RSM tried to distance the offending speaker from its conference to protect itself from abuse.
All this is understandable, but it is exactly the wrong response. Appeasing bullies like Dershowitz will not stop them. It will rather encourage them to go further. The question is, do we in this country want a McCarthyite witch hunt? If not, then we must confront the bullies and expose them for the intellectual terrorists they are, bent on destroying the values of a free society. To do otherwise will invite the fate of all repressed people, cowed and intimidated, hating their tormentors, but too afraid to say so. |
shame on the oxford union |
|
Back to top |
|
|
faceless admin
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I wonder why these institutions are so intimidated?
Though, I also have to wonder at the fact that twice today I've seen universities attacked for encouraging extremist speakers. Firstly in the case of Nick Griffin and now this one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
the oxford union had nick griffin speak apparently!
normans not extremist |
|
Back to top |
|
|
faceless admin
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I'd say talking good clear sense is as extreme as pushing dark ignorance these days - it seems the middle ground of murk is where we should be in order to not upset the people who will complaining about someone like Finkelstein. In fact, I'd say he's more likely to upset those pro-Israelis with an agenda as he clearly isn't ignorant and can't be dismissed as easily as Griffin. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Salim201
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
the way that university's are set up as institutions in the UK, means that they ALL are subject to government review which affects their funding status and professor contracts etc. Also universities aren't democratic, they're not subject to students, faculty or technicians, they're subject to trustees and highly influential boards. There's a really good article in the guardian about why there so few dissident academics in Britain. For example why don't we have a chomsky or a finkelstein? its a good questions, any thoughts?? '' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
don't suppose you have that article bookmarked salim?
i've often wondered where our versions of chomsky and finkelstein are, we're got a few people - but no one up there at their level |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Salim201
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mandy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Thanks Luke & Selim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Salim201
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
actually the most serious academic dissident we have in britain is Terry Eagleton, he's the only credible renowned professor who came out publicly against the aggression against Iraq and US/UK policies abroad. He's a marxist theorist and quite well known in the field of literary theory. I only learned of him when studying literary criticisms because he's the authority on that topic, he doesn't get much promotion in any mainstream media but is seriously worth checking out.
Its an appalling statistic that only one serious British academic came out against the war!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nekokate
Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
luke wrote: | I've often wondered where our versions of chomsky and finkelstein are, we're got a few people - but no one up there at their level |
Maybe John Pilger? Oh! And that other fella, whats-his-face who went on Big Brother and saluted Saddam Hussein... LOL!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Salim201
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
or christopher hitchens!!! yay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mandy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Does Robert Fisk count ?
I know he lives now in Lebanon .. but he is English. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
nekokate wrote: | Maybe John Pilger? Oh! And that other fella, whats-his-face who went on Big Brother and saluted Saddam Hussein... LOL!!! |
pilgers australian
bez met saddam hussein?!
if that had been the case they'd have been searching for mdma not wmd |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Couchtripper - 2005-2015
|