Rush Hour Bridge Collapse Kills 7 in Minneapolis

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pirtybirdy
'Native New Yorker'


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: FL USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:01 am    Post subject: Rush Hour Bridge Collapse Kills 7 in Minneapolis Reply with quote




MINNEAPOLIS — An interstate bridge jammed with rush-hour traffic suddenly broke into huge sections and collapsed into the Mississippi River Wednesday, pitching dozens of cars 60 feet into the water and killing at least seven people.

The eight-lane Interstate 35W bridge, a major Minneapolis artery, was in the midst of being repaired and two lanes in each direction were closed when the bridge buckled.

"There were two lanes of traffic, bumper to bumper, at the point of the collapse. Those cars did go into the river," Minneapolis Police Lt. Amelia Huffman. "At this point there is nothing to suggest that this was anything other than a structural collapse."

Jamie Winegar of Houston was sitting in traffic shortly after 6 p.m. when all of a sudden she started hearing "boom, boom, boom and we were just dropping, dropping, dropping, dropping."

The car she was riding in landed on top of a smaller car but did not fall into the water. She said her nephew yelled, "'It's an earthquake!' and then we realized the bridge was collapsing."

Minneapolis Fire Chief Jim Clack said 60 people were taken to area hospitals for treatment and that the death toll could rise.

Rescuers called off the search as nightfall made it too dangerous to search the waters filled with chucks of the mangled bridge and at least 50 vehicles in the water.

"We think there are several more vehicles in the river we can't see yet," Clack said, adding that the likelihood of finding survivors was slim.

Dr. Joseph Clinton, emergency medical chief at Hennepin County Medical Center, said his hospital treated 28 injured people — including six who were in critical condition.

Clinton said at least one of the victims had drowned.

The Homeland Security Department also said the collapse did not appear to be terrorism-related. The National Transportation Safety Board planned to send a team of investigators to Minneapolis, NTSB spokesman Ted Lopatkiewicz said.

Gov. Tim Pawlenty said the bridge was inspected by the Minnesota Department of Transportation in 2005 and 2006 and that no structural problems were noted. "There were some minor things that needed attention," he said.

Police Chief Tim Dolan said officers were checking other bridges as a precaution.

The steel-arched bridge, which was built in 1967, rose about 64 feet above the river and stretched about 1,900 feet across the river. The bridge was built with a single 458-foot-long steel arch to avoid putting any piers in the water that might interfere with river navigation.

A burning truck and a school bus clung to one slanted slab. The bus had just crossed the bridge before it crumpled into pieces.

Christine Swift's 10-year-old daughter, Kaleigh, was on the bus returning from a field trip and called her mother. "She was screaming, 'The bridge collapsed!"' Swift said.

She said a police officer told her all the kids got off the bus safely.

It appeared that the center section of the bridge dropped straight down and pancaked in the middle of the river, leaving several vehicles stranded on a broken island of wreckage. As divers plumbed the waters, other rescuers searched frantically for victims amid broken, zigzagged sections of blacktop. Some of the injured were carried up the riverbanks.

Dozens of vehicles were scattered and stacked on top of each other amid the rubble. Some people were stranded on parts of the bridge that weren't completely in the water.

Many motorists could have been headed to the Minnesota Twins game not far from the bridge. Team officials decided to play the game after conferring with department of public safety officials. It was decided that sending 20,000-25,000 people back into traffic could hinder rescue efforts, said team president Dave St. Peter.

Catherine Yankelevich survived a 1994 earthquake in Northridge, Calif., and was on the I-35W bridge when it began to shake. "Cars started flying and I was falling and saw the water," she said. After her car plunged into the river, she climbed out the driver's side window and swam to shore uninjured.

Road crews had been working on the 40-year-old bridge's deck, joints, guardrails and lights this week. "None of it would be related to the structure," said Bob McFarlin, assistant to Minnesota Transportation Commissioner Carol Molnau.

The bridge was scheduled for inspection this fall, he said.

Tom Sloan, head of the bridge division for Progressive Contractors Inc. said his company had 18 workers on the bridge at the time of the collapse and one was unaccounted for on Wednesday night. Three were hospitalized, while several others were treated for minor injuries, he said.

"Obviously, this is a catastrophe of historic proportions for Minnesota," said Gov. Tim Pawlenty. "And right now we are focused on making sure that we are doing everything to respond to the needs of those individuals that may have been harmed in this incident."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
alan1254
King of the Marshes


Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: Thailand

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

looks like the california qhuake a few years back , same kind of colapse , must say it is so unusual to have that kind of failure with modern structures last one i can remember was the 'box' section bridge in australia maybe 20 years ago
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

what a nightmare - makes me wonder about the chances of a similar thing happening again as stuff made in the 50s and 60s starts to crumble
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2 things struck me about this :

a) I am so glad the 60 kids on the school bus managed to get out.

b) Echoing Faceless's comment, it was only yesterday I was reading an article about the infrastructure problem in the US. The article can be found at : http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/sinking_feeling_chapters_lv_lxii_doh?tx=3

Embedded below :
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is just so scary when things like this happen. I am glad that it wasn't any worse then what it could have been.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Video of the collapse can be seen on :
http://www.kare11.com/video/player.aspx?aid=51385&bw=

Embed below doesn't seem to work


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pirtybirdy
'Native New Yorker'


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: FL USA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 2:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm afraid to say I think more things like this will happen in future. Only now everyone is ordered to check all bridges for major cracks, etc. We haven't been working on our infrastructure for ions. This isn't a political thing. This lacking in governments from both sides of the fence many years. We have infrastructure problems, not enough refineries, and a crap public transportation system. I'd like to see these all improved someday. If I have to be taxed, I'd like to see improvements in these areas, not pork barrel crap. In any case, my sympathies go out to these poor people that were killed/hurt in the bridge collapse and to their familes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what's 'pork barrel crap'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
what's 'pork barrel crap'?

From Wiki
In American English, meaning a supply of money that is provided to various supplicants. The term is mainly reserved for politics.
Contents

A pork barrel (or pork barrel politics) describes government spending that is intended to benefit constituents of a politician in return for their political support, either in the form of campaign contributions or votes. The term is thought to have originated on Southern United States plantations, where slaves were allocated the unwanted remainder of slaughtered pigs, or the "pork barrel." Typically it involves funding for government programs whose economic or service benefits are concentrated in a particular area but whose costs are spread among all taxpayers. Public works projects and agricultural subsidies are the most commonly cited examples, but they do not exhaust the possibilities. Pork barrel spending is often allocated through last-minute additions to appropriation bills. A politician who supplies his or her constituents with considerable funding is said to be "bringing home the bacon."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pirtybirdy
'Native New Yorker'


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: FL USA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Too me in a nutshell, it just means politicians adding crap to a bill to spend money on something that isn't top priority. Top priorities like strengthening our infrastructure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pirtybirdy wrote:
Too me in a nutshell, it just means politicians adding crap to a bill to spend money on something that isn't top priority. Top priorities like strengthening our infrastructure.

You need to go to the wiki page and add that in! thumbs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now that I know what you mean I did notice that there were conditions put on certain bills and it really seemed like they were playing a game of Buckaroo - 'let's see how much we can weigh it down before it kicks back!'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Couchtripper - 2005-2015