View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
harry perkins
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skylace Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I'm moving these topics to the Galloway section as that is where they need to be |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nekokate
Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I don't find that offensive or distasteful at all. George would, naturally. I've known of whitestkids.com for months and they are not racists, they just push the envelope to the limit, like Chris Morris of Brass Eye fame, and Marc M of sickanimation.com (which is absolutely brilliant).
The point is it's a parody, and a world where that video is illegal is a world I don't want to live in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harry perkins
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I tend to agree, I first saw this a while back and was rolling around laughing at some points, like "my bitch Anne Frank" or "Theres a party down at Schindler's and I'm on his A-list". I don't think George was talking about making THAT kind of video illegal anyway.
ps Sky I can see why this is in the Galloway section now cause it follows on from his latest show, but the other one I thought about and decided not to post here because its not directly related to GG. But I suppose most political stuff is posted here and Iraq is a very close subject to George, so this might be the right place. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skylace Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Harry Perkins wrote: | I tend to agree, I first saw this a while back and was rolling around laughing at some points, like "my bitch Anne Frank" or "Theres a party down at Schindler's and I'm on his A-list". I don't think George was talking about making THAT kind of video illegal anyway.
ps Sky I can see why this is in the Galloway section now cause it follows on from his latest show, but the other one I thought about and decided not to post here because its not directly related to GG. But I suppose most political stuff is posted here and Iraq is a very close subject to George, so this might be the right place. |
My thoughts exactly Harry! I can see where you were coming from and I thought about it myself, but I felt it best with it being a bit more political and along the lines of things we discuss in here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mandy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Why do I have to be the contrarian ? (maybe it makes for good debate).
If George was going to object to this, he might object on the sole ground that it is inappropriate for a kids' audience .. i.e. If on TV, above a revised 10:30pm watershed mark (up from 9pm).
i.e. put it in the category of a video showing a student slapping a teacher, which is something he mentioned in his recent shows.
Would you want your 6 year old to see this video ? Would you want this rap to be played in a school's playground ?
p.s. An analogy is the old British comedy "Fawlty Towers" .. now that was FUNNY, and suitable (I think) for kids viewing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nekokate
Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
GG_Fan wrote: | Why do I have to be the contrarian? |
You don't, but you have a pathological need to be - it's the only thing that keeps you in perpetual motion on this forum, my dear. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
faceless admin
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I'd say it's just pish rather than inspired. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mandy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I wonder in how many countries in the world would it be illegal under present laws to broadcast or even play this in a private or public place (at any time) ? (even if only you are watching)
At least it can be accessed by the ".de" (German) web site of Google :
http://video.google.de/videosearch?q=Whitest+Kids+-+Hitler+Rap |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mandy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
After asking the above question, I came across this :
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://fpp.co.uk/docs/Irving/RadDi/2007/070407.html
"MORE seriously, the German Government has quietly admitted that over the last twelve months it prosecuted over 18,000 Germans for offences of "right-wing extremism," of which only a few hundred involved actual violence: i.e. they prosecuted over seventeen thousand thought-crimes -- people unwitting displaying the old swastika emblem, or even worse, National Socialist ideas, and perhaps even "denying the H.""
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i.e. The video displayed the "old swastika emblem", and there is no exception in German rules for parody etc.
I am also now not comfortable in describing Nazism as "right-wing extremism" .. since it stands for "National Socialism", shouldn't it be "left-wing extremism" ?
Right wingers go for low taxation, capitalism, each person to themselves (with constitutional protection). Left wingers (including socialists) are more society orientated. Nazism takes this too far by being racist in the definition of the group. So how does that make it right wing extremism, as opposed to left wing extremism ?
On this spectrum, the extreme right are the globalists, and the extreme left at the Nazis, with the slightly less extreme left communism. This puts "ordinary" (non-Nazi) socialists and constitutional defenders "in the middle" .. which then chimes with my other postings of the common ground between the socialist "left" and the constitutionalist "right" in the USA. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
faceless admin
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
GG_Fan wrote: |
I am also now not comfortable in describing Nazism as "right-wing extremism" .. since it stands for "National Socialism", shouldn't it be "left-wing extremism" ? |
no, because true socialism is international, not local and at the expense of others. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mandy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
faceless wrote: | GG_Fan wrote: |
I am now not comfortable in describing Nazism as "right-wing extremism" .. since it stands for "National Socialism", shouldn't it be "left-wing extremism" ? |
no, because true socialism is international, not local and at the expense of others. |
My viewpoint is that the Nazis have taken the left-wing socialism idea to a racist extreme, i.e. left-wing extremism. Left wingers (including socialists) are more society orientated. Nazism takes this too far by being racist in the definition of the group. So that makes them left wing extremism,.
Right wingers go for low taxation, capitalism, each person to themselves (with the most extreme abandoning constitutional and legal protection, and adopting raw capitalism).
On this "spectrum", the extreme right are the globalists [extreme capitalists / Military Industrial Complex (MIC)], and the extreme left at the Nazis, with center-right being constitutionalists, and center-left being Socialists.
This puts Socialists and constitutional defenders "in the center" .. which then chimes with my other postings of the common ground between the socialist "left" and the constitutionalist "right" in the USA.
The Main Stream Media has an interest in branding the socialists as extreme left, and constitutionalists as extreme right. It means they can label their own "extreme capitalism"/"MIC" positions as non-extreme middle-of-the-road. It also creates a psychological barrier for the socialists to liaise with the constitutionalists since they are seen to be liasing with the opposite end of the spectrum .. when in reality they are both in the middle.
Something to ponder : In a contest between "extreme capitalism"/"MIC" versus socialists/constitutionalists, who would the Nazis support ?
Another issue is where would communism be in the spectrum ? It should possiblt be to the left of Socialism, i.e. between Socialism and Nazism |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harry perkins
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Nazism is right wing because it is a particularist, racist ideology. Because the real interests of the working class, who are the majority of the world's people, are international and socialist the capitalist class always encourages ideologies that divide people, like nationalism and racism. Fascism and Nazism were the most extreme cases of this, arising when Europe was ablaze with revolutionary agitation following World War 1 and the Russian Revolution. Hitler's personal obsession with Jews fitted the needs of the times because by blaming the Jews the Nazis could pretend to be anti-capitalist (as there were many Jewish capitalists) while staying anti-communist (as there were many Jewish communists). The Third Reich was built on the destruction of the organised left and labour movement, but capitalism survived, albeit with Jewish and anti-Nazi capitalists liquidated. Many capitalist firms profited from the war and the holocaust, right up to the end. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mandy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Thanks Harry. I wonder if this issue which I raised about whether left or right is academic, and indeed left/right descriptions can vary depending on the country.
Harry Perkins wrote: | the capitalist class always encourages ideologies that divide people, like nationalism and racism. Fascism and Nazism were the most extreme cases of this |
I don't disagree with that .. indeed, that is what I am trying to find better labels for, e.g. the capitalist [right wing] divided the left wing into "socialists", "communists" and "fascists/Nazism" .. but that still makes all 3 "left". The right remains the capitalist / MIC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-right_politics
"The Left is broadly identified with "the interests of the masses", while the Right "favours the interests of the established propertied classes".[1]"
Nazism on this definition would be "left" if, by masses, they mean the masses in their
country.
I assume there is no dispute that "extreme capitalism"/"MIC" are extreme right, whilst
socialists would be left wing. In this "battle", the US constitutionalists would be against the "extreme capitalism"/"MIC" and with the socialists.
Who would a "Nazi" party in the US support ? I think they would be against the
"extreme capitalism"/"MIC" .. but if you think I am wrong, please let me know. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nekokate
Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
GG_Fan wrote: | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-right_politics
"The Left is broadly identified with "the interests of the masses", while the Right "favours the interests of the established propertied classes".[1]"
Nazism on this definition would be "left" if, by masses, they mean the masses in their
country. |
But it wasn't the masses in their country even, because the Jews were part of their country, too. Nazism was in the interests of the few. It wasn't about whether you were a German, but whether you were Aryan enough, national identity or not. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Couchtripper - 2005-2015
|