Rumsfeld's oil quote
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> Pirty's Purgatory
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:35 pm    Post subject: Rumsfeld's oil quote Reply with quote

George often attributes a quote to Donald Rumsfeld: "It's not our fault God put our oil under other people's countries".

I can't find reference to this anywhere. Anyone know if this is true or not, or where it came from?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
mickyv



Joined: 12 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have looked for this before and have concluded that GG has got it mixed up as it appears to be based on a quote by Dick Cheney, and the exact quote is “The problem is that the good Lord didn't see fit to always put oil and gas resources where there are democratic governments”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:13 am    Post subject: Re: Rumsfeld's oil quote Reply with quote

I think it is poetic licence. The implications are the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mickyv



Joined: 12 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed GG_Fan, the Neocon belief that the West has a Divine right to steal other Countries resources.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
luke



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thats not quite the same though is it - i feel conned now, i used that quote a few times Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exactly, Luke. If he didn't really say it then George shouldn't say he did. I'm sure Rumsfeld really is callous enough to think things like that (and probably say them in private), but if he has never said it, then... huh...

Think of how often George steps in to correct people who use the common falsehood that Ahmadinejad once said in Farsi that he would like to "wipe Israel off the map". This is exactly the same thing - it doesn't matter how evil someone is, if they didn't say something then they didn't say it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nekokate wrote:
Think of how often George steps in to correct people who use the common falsehood that Ahmadinejad once said in Farsi that he would like to "wipe Israel off the map". This is exactly the same thing


I don't believe it is the same thing. The misquote from Ahmadinejad is intended to convey that he wants to invade and kill all Israelis, and thus act as an excuse to nuke Iran.

George was simply paraphrasing, whilst maintaining the same meaning.

In any case, the Ahmadinejad deliberate misquote is a government sanctioned black-propaganda/fear mongering. So the scale/effect of the two are no-where near the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say the key phrase is "our oil" - that's an important difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
I'd say the key phrase is "our oil" - that's an important difference.


Faceless, would you be "happy" with :
"It's not our fault God put the oil we need under other people's countries".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
luke



Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no, say it as it is, but add - The problem is that the good Lord didn't see fit to always put oil and gas resources where there are democratic governments ( that answer to and work for us ;) )

and thats before we look at the state of democracy in america ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GG_Fan wrote:
faceless wrote:
I'd say the key phrase is "our oil" - that's an important difference.


Faceless, would you be "happy" with :
"It's not our fault God put the oil we need under other people's countries".


no I "would not"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GG_Fan wrote:
nekokate wrote:
Think of how often George steps in to correct people who use the common falsehood that Ahmadinejad once said in Farsi that he would like to "wipe Israel off the map". This is exactly the same thing


I don't believe it is the same thing. The misquote from Ahmadinejad is intended to convey that he wants to invade and kill all Israelis, and thus act as an excuse to nuke Iran.

George was simply paraphrasing, whilst maintaining the same meaning.

In any case, the Ahmadinejad deliberate misquote is a government sanctioned black-propaganda/fear mongering. So the scale/effect of the two are no-where near the same.


But this is my whole point; he was not just paraphrasing. He regularly says that Rumsfeld actually said this - and as far as we all seem to be currently aware, Rumsfeld didn't say this. Are you just trying to invent an argument here, for the sake of pedantry? George is saying something that is not true, and he is presenting it as fact. That is wrong no matter if you're doing it to encourage hatred of the Arab world, or hatred of neocon imperialism.

If he said something along the lines of "let's not forget, Rumsfeld has the mindset that God put their oil under other people's countries" then I would have no problem, because that is true. But he is stating as an absolute fact, on an almost weekly basis, something that is not genuine.

Are you telling me that untruths and mis-quotes are only bad if they come from the other side of the fence?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mandy



Joined: 07 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nekokate wrote:
Are you telling me that untruths and mis-quotes are only bad if they come from the other side of the fence?


Kate,

It is not untruths, nor misquotes. I believe it is valid para-phrasing, whilst maintaining the same meaning as the original.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am, in writing this, the originator of the phrase, "misquotes and unclear para-phrasing are two cheeks of the same backside".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nekokate



Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Location: West Yorkshire, UK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GG_Fan wrote:
nekokate wrote:
Are you telling me that untruths and mis-quotes are only bad if they come from the other side of the fence?


Kate,

It is not untruths, nor misquotes. I believe it is valid para-phrasing, whilst maintaining the same meaning as the original.


You're starting to lose me now. How is stating repeatedly that something is a fact when it is not a fact, anything other than an untruth? In order to paraphrase, you must make your audience aware you are paraphrasing, otherwise, by definition, you are not.

When George uses this quote, he puts it forward as a fact. It is not a fact.

GG_Fan, if I attributed an unflattering quote to you in order to defame you, you would be the first to jump on it and point out that you never spoke or typed those words. Why are you refusing to accept that this is an instance in which George (and I adore him, by the way) is wrong? Unless you can prove - which you can't - that Rumsfeld actually spoke that quote, then everytime George says he did, he is mistaken, misquoting, and propogating an untruth.

I'm not labouring over this point in order to discredit George, rather I'm doing so because I believe so strongly that people like him, and me, and I assume you, who are on the right side of the political fence, should stay true to our convictions. The anti-war, anti-capitalist, anti-BS, pro-transparency, pro-honesty people need to keep each other in check. No lies, no untruths, even if we stand to benefit from them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> Pirty's Purgatory All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Couchtripper - 2005-2015