Appeal court rules against man haunted by fly in water bottl

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
IRiSHMaFIA
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:23 pm    Post subject: Appeal court rules against man haunted by fly in water bottl Reply with quote

A Windsor, Ont., man lost out on a $341,775 court judgment yesterday, when the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that a bottling company should not have been held liable for triggering a phobia of flies that altered his personality and killed his sex life.

Waddah Mustapha -- a Lebanese immigrant with a mania for cleanliness -- had won the award in 2005 after persuading a judge that a water-bottling company ought to pay dearly for delivering him a water bottle with a dead fly floating near the top.

Soon after the incident, Mr. Mustapha, 46, began to suffer serious psychiatric symptoms -- a major depressive disorder with associated phobia and anxiety.

He became edgy, argumentative, depressed, couldn't sleep and refused to even drink coffee because it contained water.

Overturning the award in a 3-0 ruling, the Court of Appeal said the outcome of the fly incident was so bizarre that it couldn't have been reasonably foreseen by the company, Culligan of Canada Ltd.

It said that neither Mr. Mustapha nor his family came close to suffering a foreseeable physical injury: "Nobody drank anything from the bottle. It remained sealed. There can be no physical harm from seeing a dead fly in a bottle of water."

Writing for the court, Mr. Justice Robert Blair said that a defendant cannot be found liable for psychiatric harm where the harm "by any objective measurement, consists of an exaggerated reaction by an obsessive person of particular sensibilities to what, in reality, is a relatively minor and trivial incident -- the sight of a dead fly in a bottle of consumer water."

At the time of the incident, Judge Blair said, Mr. Mustapha and his wife had two daughters -- aged 7 and 3 -- and Ms. Mustapha was seven months pregnant. Mr. Mustapha is a hair stylist who immigrated to Canada in 1976.

Based on Culligan's representations about the purity and healthful quality of its water, including how it would benefit pregnant women and children and how much better it was for someone than city water, Mr. Mustapha installed Culligan dispensers both in his salon and at home, Judge Blair said.

"He and his family used nothing but Culligan water for consumption thereafter."

He noted that the family home was spotless: "Cleanliness and hygiene are matters of utmost importance to them."

In that context, Judge Blair said, the fly incident on Nov. 21, 2001, "offended their sense of sanctity in the purity of their home, and shattered Mr. Mustapha's life."

Although none of the family drank from the unopened bottle, both parents vomited after. Mr. Mustapha, in particular, couldn't put the experience out of his mind.

"He became obsessed with thoughts about the dead fly in the water and about the potential implications for his family's health of their having possibly been drinking unpurified water supplied in the past," Judge Blair said.

In his 2005 trial ruling, Mr. Justice John Brockenshire of the Superior Court of Ontario described the bizarre symptoms Mr. Mustapha began exhibiting after the incident.

"He pictures flies walking on animal feces or rotten food and then being in his supposedly pure water," Judge Brockenshire said. "He has been constipated, is bothered by revolting mental images of flies on feces, etc., can no longer take long and enjoyable showers and instead, after lengthy treatment, can only take perfunctory showers with his head down so the water does not strike his face."

Writing on behalf of Madam Justice Eleanore Cronk and Mr. Justice Edward Then, Judge Blair ordered Mr. Mustapha to pay legal costs of $30,000 to the bottling company.

___________________________________________________

What a bloody fool. He was a psycho long before seeing the fly in the water as far as I'm concerned.

This is just another example of a sue happy society, thinking they can make an easy buck. I'm glad he lost AND had to pay the the water companies legal bills.

Maybe outcomes like this will show all the other idiots like him not to take advantage of the legal system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

they should make the lawyers pay for the cases if they fail - that would stop 99% of them coming close to court. When you employ any normal professional you don't pay if they fuck it up, so why can lawyers get away with being such leeches?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
IRiSHMaFIA
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
they should make the lawyers pay for the cases if they fail - that would stop 99% of them coming close to court. When you employ any normal professional you don't pay if they fuck it up, so why can lawyers get away with being such leeches?


Good point. I think if they were liable for atleast half the legal fees having to be paid out such as this, it might stop them taking cases by chancers like this idiot. They shouldn't walk away being paid any fee or looking any less foolish than their client.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eefanincan
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
they should make the lawyers pay for the cases if they fail - that would stop 99% of them coming close to court. When you employ any normal professional you don't pay if they fuck it up, so why can lawyers get away with being such leeches?


Spot on, Face! It's a shame there are lawyers out there willing to take stupid cases like this..... it gives a bad name to all the honest lawyers out there (and yes, there are some!).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gasman59
Resident Ghost Hunter


Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: Pennsylvania USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
they should make the lawyers pay for the cases if they fail - that would stop 99% of them coming close to court. When you employ any normal professional you don't pay if they fuck it up, so why can lawyers get away with being such leeches?


Amen Bruvver Face !!!!!

Irish wrote:
This is just another example of a sue happy society, thinking they can make an easy buck.


Amen Sistah Irish !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Couchtripper - 2005-2015