| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
faceless
admin
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 am Post subject: Cannabis and the law... |
 |
|
|
|
Why they can't make a distinction for skunk is beyond me. All they'd have to do is set a limit on the THC content and that would be that. Hash oil (which is created in the same way as a tincture, using alcohol to absorb the essential oil from the mass of vegetable matter) is still listed, as far as I'm aware, as a Class A drug along with heroin and coke, so what's the problem with marking a difference between a lump of Moroccan hash at about 3-4% THC and a bud of Northern Lights grass at around 20-30%?
The difference in effect between average hash and average skunk is the difference between a pint of lager and a pint of whisky. It's not rocket science. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SpursFan1902
Pitch Queen
Joined: 24 May 2007
Location: Sunshine State
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Probably at the bottom of all of it is they can't agree on how to tax you for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brown Sauce
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| how you can put magic mushrooms in the same hole as crack and speed escapes me ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Brown Sauce wrote: | | how you can put magic mushrooms in the same hole as crack and speed escapes me ... |
yeah thats mad, they were legal until a few years back! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brown Sauce
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
i always remember them as being legal ..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
faceless
admin
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| They are still legal as long as they're not prepared in any way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mandozilla
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:06 pm Post subject: Re: Cannabis and the law... |
|
|
|
|
| faceless wrote: |
Why they can't make a distinction for skunk is beyond me. All they'd have to do is set a limit on the THC content and that would be that. |
You know faceless I had the same thought today, and the way you have articulated it, I could not have surpassed. The other thing that i cant stop thinking about is how schizophrenic our government is looking on this issue. All doctors I have talked to, one of which has studied and is published on the topic of weed and mental health, all find this hard to understand. Yet the know-it-nots who have only statistics and our severely depleted back pocket to look at seem to want to make more and more of us criminals! I was brought up to believe that the government was there to protect us from danger not pleasure, but with their mental history of cannabis and alcohol laws seem to spin that completely on its head.
Here is one guy who feels no safer and less happy for this.
Mandozilla |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mandozilla
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Of course, if i lived in England or Wales i would probably have... a reason to be pissed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
