| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Location: by the sea
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 12:31 pm Post subject: zimbabwe |
 |
|
|
|
i saw these recently and after george talked about zimbabwe last night i thought some might be interested
| Quote: | Hysteria on Mugabe, Silence on Nigeria
For every crime Mugabe has committed, the Nigerian elite over the last 40 years has committed it five times over. But there isn't the hysteria you find in the media about Mugabe. Election rigging ? every election held in Nigeria's history has been rigged, the only one that wasn't was cancelled by the army. Brutality ? The Nigerian army has killed more than a million people in the oil rich eastern part of the country over the last 4 decades to protect the elite's access to the region's resources. Corruption - even Mugabe's worst detractors can't point to any mansions he owns in Hampstead heath, Hundreds of such properties are owned in London alone by members of the Nigerian elite, add in golf courses, Knightsbridge flats and you begin to realise where some of the almost £.5 trillion stolen from the country’s coffers since independence has gone. Economic mismanagement - what about an oil rich country (8th largest oil supplies in the world) Where electricity can't be guaranteed for 12 hours a day (no, there is no insurgency there). They also mention Mugabe’s punitive forced urban resettlement programme rendering hundreds of thousands homeless. In 1990 in Nigeria a massive slum next to the affluent Victoria island was razed by the dictatorship, 300,000 poor people were made homeless - there wasn't a whisper in the western media, understandable since many of the plots (facing the sea) were handed over to western diplomats and business men.
The difference between Nigeria and Zimbabwe for the west is not the wretchedness of their governments - it is in their obedience to western instructions. Since Independence the Nigerian government has functioned by and large as an offshore department of the foreign office, Mugabe has not – that is what explains the visceral hatred towards him from the press in the west - its that simple |
| Quote: | Crimes of the empire
THERE is something surreal about Gordon Brown mounting his high horse and telling European and African government leaders that they must choose between his attendance and that of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe at a summit in Lisbon on December 8-9.
The Prime Minister insists on Mr Mugabe's exclusion from the summit because of the Zimbabwean president's "abuse of his own people."
He declares that there is neither freedom of association nor freedom of the press there. And, further, there is "widespread torture and mass intimidation of the political opposition."
Without excusing in any way, the excesses of the moribund and authoritarian ZANU (PF) regime in Zimbabwe, are the crimes denounced by Mr Brown unique to Zimbabwe?
Aren't they also endemic in such states as Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt, which are not only regarded as international forces of moderation but are also fully fledged participants in the US-led fraudulent "war on terror?"
Then again, horrific as torture and intimidation are, do they begin to compare with the international war crime of illegally invading and occupying Iraq?
Before claiming the moral high ground, all British government ministers should examine their own hands for blood.
Our Prime Minister, as Chancellor of Exchequer, was totally implicated in Tony Blair's collaboration with the White House in preparing for war for oil and military domination while passing it off as a means of controlling weapons of mass destruction.
He provided the finance for the invasion and pledged to make available whatever it took to back Washington's self-appointed role of global policeman.
And what has been the result? A 2006 study by the respected medical journal The Lancet suggested that 655,000 Iraqis had died as a result of the March 2003 invasion.
And, last week, a new report by the Opinion Research Bureau, a polling organisation that has been engaged to conduct studies for the BBC and the Conservative Party, reported that no fewer than 1.2 million Iraqi citizens "have been murdered" since the invasion.
When the PM insists that Britain will stand by its responsibilities, he should also acknowledge his own responsibility for the mayhem that is Iraq. Nor are Britain's hands clean with regard to Zimbabwe. Ministers and media vie with each other to condemn the nationalisation of white farmers' land and foreign-owned businesses in Zimbabwe, but they don't examine why this happens.
When the British empire conquered what is now Zimbabwe in 1889, it allocated 70 per cent - the most fertile areas - of land to white farmers to raise export crops. Africans received no compensation.
At the 1979 Zimbabwean independence negotiations in London in 1979, white settler land ownership was enshrined for a decade and, following that, the British government was to fund land sales to landless Africans.
Britain suspended that agreement in 1997-8 when Zimbabwe rejected a World Bank structural agreement programme, halted privatisation and introduced tariffs to protect local industry.
The country has since suffered an imperialist economic blockade, provoking political and economic crises. The struggle for basic freedoms in Zimbabwe, including trade union rights, will not be assisted by being confused with a sinister outside-directed conspiracy to impose regime change that is acceptable to the US and Britain.
from the morning star |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Couchtripper - 2005-2015
|
