Brothers guilty of letting dog get fat

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:16 pm    Post subject: Brothers guilty of letting dog get fat Reply with quote


Rusty 'Grossly' Overweight
Updated: 15:06, Friday January 12, 2007

Two brothers have been found guilty of animal cruelty for allowing their pet dog's weight to exceed more than 11 stone. Derek and David Benton were convicted of causing unnecessary suffering to their dog Rusty by overfeeding. The pair, aged 62 and 53 respectively, from Fordham, Cambridgeshire, allowed the dog's weight to rise from eight to more than 11-and-a-half-stone in two years. RSPCA inspectors say the Bentons failed to give Rusty an appropriate diet and allowed the dog to become "hugely and grossly" overweight. The brothers said the dog is overweight because it has arthritis and cannot exercise easily.

Their lawyer, Ann-Marie Gregory, told magistrates in Ely, Cambridgeshire: "They are not specialist dog trainers. They are not specialist Labrador trainers. They are common or garden dog owners." The RSPCA had spent more than £3,000 trying to reduce the dog's weight in recent months. She added: "How many people have £3,000 in their pocket to spend on their pet dog?". Miss Gregory said there was no evidence that the dog had been "stuffed" with treats or overfed. She said the Bentons fed him a small bowl of dog food in the mornings and the evenings and gave him a bone as a treat on a Saturday.

Prosecutor Stephen Climie refuted her suggestions that the prosecution was a "test case". "This is not a test case," he said. "This is a case peculiar to its facts." The brothers denied any offence. RSPCA inspectors took the dog from the brothers in March and since then it has lost three-and-a-half stones under the guidance of vets.

-------------

That's pretty good they can do this for a dog - next step, parents who feed their kids so much that they become grossly overweight. Imagine a dog having better protection against this type of abuse than children?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We've had children taken away by the State of the New Mexico because they were being overfed and were obese as a result.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faceless
admin


Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Skylace wrote:
We've had children taken away by the State of the New Mexico because they were being overfed and were obese as a result.


nice one - I've not heard of any cases like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
IRiSHMaFIA
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've always thought that parents that let their children get grossly over weight should be charged with child abuse. It's putting their health at risk and doing them mental harm as well. Children are ridiculed horribly if they're over weight and it's not their fault.

I'm glad they're doing this with these 2. Even though some think they're doing their pet a favour by giving them treats or feeding them human food, they're slowly killing the them as they'd have the same health problems as a human would being over weight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skylace
Admin


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
Skylace wrote:
We've had children taken away by the State of the New Mexico because they were being overfed and were obese as a result.


nice one - I've not heard of any cases like that.


It's very new here. And it caused quite a stir to say the least. I'm not sure what has happened in the long run but at least they did set a precedence in that case. I do remember the child did have a medical problem that did cause problems with the weight. However, the parents were not taking care of it and feeding the child junk. So the state stepped in and took the child away. They did help set a precedence. They basically got the parents on medical neglect.

I was very surprised when it happened because New Mexico State's CPS (chid protection services) laws a very poor. So now if I can only convience them to take one of my kids who is getting burned with cigarettes out of the home I'll be even more pleased.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kezza
Gone To The Dogs!


Joined: 30 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:12 am    Post subject: Re: Brothers guilty of letting dog get fat Reply with quote

faceless wrote:
That's pretty good they can do this for a dog - next step, parents who feed their kids so much that they become grossly overweight. Imagine a dog having better protection against this type of abuse than children?


I was thinking the exact same thing!! Very interesting article.

I once had a cat that was overweight. I couldn't figure out why, despite changing her diet, she wasn't losing weight. Turns out my clever feline had worked out how to open the container where the dog's food was kept! She was snacking away on the dog food, that cheeky kitty!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Couchtripper Forum Index -> News mash All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Couchtripper - 2005-2015