View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Skylace wrote: | Decide what? |
what happens in cuba |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skylace Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
luke wrote: | Skylace wrote: | Decide what? |
what happens in cuba |
I am a firm believer it's the people's right of whatever country they are in to decide. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marcella-FL Don't make me pull this van over!!!
Joined: 01 May 2006 Location: KMC, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: Re: 184 nations vote against US embargo of Cuba |
|
|
|
|
luke wrote: | just when you thought the american goverment couldn't piss you off anymore ... |
Stick around - we'll try harder.
So if those other 184 nations are so concerned for Cuba why don't they "pick up the slack"?
Quote: |
Skylace wrote:
Decide what?
luke wrote:
what happens in cuba
|
stays in Cuba? unless it heads to the USA on the back of a dolphin.
Oh and not to be nit-picky but can we agree that the plural of country is countries? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skylace Admin
Joined: 29 Apr 2006 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 8:03 pm Post subject: Re: 184 nations vote against US embargo of Cuba |
|
|
|
|
Marcella-FL wrote: | luke wrote: | just when you thought the american goverment couldn't piss you off anymore ... |
Stick around - we'll try harder.
So if those other 184 nations are so concerned for Cuba why don't they "pick up the slack"?
Quote: |
Skylace wrote:
Decide what?
luke wrote:
what happens in cuba
|
stays in Cuba? unless it heads to the USA on the back of a dolphin.
Oh and not to be nit-picky but can we agree that the plural of country is countries? |
I'm with you Marcella. I don't like the illegals coming over. They have honestly caused a lot more problems in Florida than good. If they want to be able to come over legally they should be allowed to but otherwise no. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:37 pm Post subject: Re: 184 nations vote against US embargo of Cuba |
|
|
|
|
Marcella-FL wrote: | Oh and not to be nit-picky but can we agree that the plural of country is countries? |
thats not being nit-picky? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marcella-FL Don't make me pull this van over!!!
Joined: 01 May 2006 Location: KMC, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
yeah I know I know ... it's like saying "no offense but .." and then go on to be offensive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Location: by the sea
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
UN member states condemn US embargo of Cuba for 20th consecutive year
The U.N. General Assembly voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to condemn the U.S. embargo against Cuba for the 20th year in a row.
The final tally was 186-2, with only Israel joining the United States as it did last year. The small Pacific nations of Palau, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands abstained as they also did last year.
Last year’s tally for the symbolic measure was almost identical, 187-2, with three abstentions.
Envoys for Vietnam, Russia, Nicaragua and many other countries, as well as the 120-member Nonaligned Movement, spoke Tuesday in favor of the measure calling for the end of the American embargo against the Caribbean country.
“The only consequences of the sanctions are the deterioration of the living standard of the Cuban population, creation of artificial barriers to its economic growth and infringement on the rights and interests of third countries,” Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said.
Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez said that the sanctions have caused direct economic damages of close to $1 trillion to the Cuban people over nearly half a century.
The United States has not eased the embargo in the nearly three years since President Barack Obama’s election raised hopes for a change in policy, he added.
“Despite the false image of flexibility that the current U.S. administration intends to portray, the blockade and the sanctions remain intact,” Rodriguez told the assembly.
“Why doesn’t President Obama’s administration take care of the U.S. problems and leave us Cubans alone to solve ours in peace?”
The United States has made clear it is not prepared to lift the sanctions entirely until the communist-run nation makes more far-reaching political and economic changes.
American Ambassador Ronald D. Godard, U.S. Senior Area Adviser for Western Hemisphere Affairs, said the embargo is a bilateral issue and “not appropriately a concern of this assembly.”
Godard said the sanctions represent “just one aspect of U.S. policy toward Cuba, whose overarching goal is to encourage a more open environment in Cuba and increased respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia-pacific/un-member-states-condemn-us-embargo-of-cuba-for-20th-consecutive-year/2011/10/25/gIQAqkL9FM_story.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
faceless admin
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Consistently drachonian. What an attitude... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|